

Not mentioned by Ian in the video is the new DxO “DeepPRIME XD” support for X-Trans files, which is clearly superior to the more basic “DeepPRIME”.
#Difference between canon full frame cameras how to
And it’s up to everyone to decide how to do that.īut if you own X-Trans cameras and use Lightroom, then using DxO as a plug-in is definitely a recommended step to take into your post processing workflow. When a full frame camera is paired with a fast lens, it can allow you the ability to obtain a very shallow depth of field, in comparison to a crop sensor camera. Look, RAW files are intended to be processed.

Well, he did the same with Canon files, but DxO did not bring any benefits in terms of sharpness to the Canon files, as opposed to Fujifilm X-Trans files, which definitely saw an improvement if passed through the DxO engine. Nope, he wanted to “help” Lightroom to deal with X-Trans files, and hence used DxO Pure RAW to transform the files into a DNG and only then processed them in Lightroom. He did not simply load the files into Lightroom to process the RAW files (with Lightroom standard settings) and then print the images. Fujifilm X-H2 + Fujinon XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WRīut he went an extra step.Canon R5 + Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM.

Ian Worth used the following gear side by side with the goal to compare the details on large prints: DxO PureRAW 3 Released with DeepPRIME XD Fujifilm X-Trans Support.This time, the magic of DxO Pure RAW comes into play. I hear many of you say now “ no, not again!” The story starts like many other stories: a full frame camera, in this case the high resolution Canon EOS R5 gets compared with a Fujifilm APS-C camera, in this case the high res Fujifilm X-H2.
